When revising ineffective security protocols, what should be prioritized?

Prioritizing suggestions from employees affected by the protocols is essential because these individuals are directly engaged in the day-to-day operations and experience the implications of security protocols firsthand. They often have valuable insights regarding what works, what doesn’t, and what can be improved. Their feedback can highlight practical challenges, potential oversights, and areas where protocols may hinder efficiency or security.

By valuing their input, organizations can develop more effective security measures that are realistic and applicable in their specific context. This approach also fosters a culture of inclusivity and collaboration, thereby enhancing employee morale and buy-in for new protocols. Although feedback from external consultants, upper management, and comparisons with competitors can also provide valuable information, the perspectives of those operating under the protocols are crucial for ensuring that revisions are relevant and beneficial in practice.